| Subject: | RE: [OM] Enough already - 24 vs 36 exposure debate |
|---|---|
| From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:36:30 +1100 |
tOM wrote: > No matter what film you have in the camera. You always are at > the end of your exposures when you are trying to get that really > great shot. This applies even if you have a cassette loaded with > 1000 exposures. Murphy's law of photography ? ...Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] An advantage of Bearded Portly Males, Tom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Subjects of our pictures - getting a little OT, Wayne Harridge |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Enough already - 24 vs 36 exposure debate, Thomas A. Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate, John A. Lind |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |