| Subject: | Re: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate |
|---|---|
| From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:31:09 EST |
In a message dated 1/1/02 12:09:00 PM Central Standard Time, olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > But now, I'm stuck with half a roll of 36 left in > Best excuse I can think of for needing extra OM bodies . . . Bill Barber |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Enough already - 24 vs 36 exposure debate, Thomas A. Dunlap |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Polarizer for the 18mm/3.5?, Dave Shupe |
| Previous by Thread: | Sharpie Pens - WAS:Re: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate, Charles Sdunek |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] MTF test, Brian Swale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |