Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Which is sharper, autofocus or manual focus?

Subject: Re: [OM] Which is sharper, autofocus or manual focus?
From: "Mickey Trageser" <mickeytr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 11:42:06 -0500
Josh,
So how did the IR beach shot turn out? I've seen IR pictures, but just can't
envision how IR would affect a scene. I've not heard of IR in association
with wedding photography. Can you post the shot?
Thanks,
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Putnam" <josh@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Mailing List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 3:41 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Which is sharper, autofocus or manual focus?


>
> My own wedding photographer used a combination of 35mm and
> 6x4.5, and frankly I don't see anything wrong with using 35mm
> for the shots that aren't likely to see big enlargements.
>
> Some of the work could only practically be done in 35mm by
> most people -- I wanted some infrared shots of the two of us
> on the beach (wedding was on the Pacific coast at Kalaloch
> Lodge), and most people aren't set up to use Kodak infrared
> in any of the formats larger than 35mm.  Sure, it would have
> been great to have an experienced IR photographer who was set
> up for 70mm, but 35mm works.
>
> --
>           josh@xxxxxxxxx is Joshua Putnam
>             http://www.phred.org/~josh/
>      Updated Infrared Photography Books List:
>    http://www.phred.org/~josh/photo/irbooks.html
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz