| Subject: | Re: [OM] AF vs. MF.. Proof!! |
|---|---|
| From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:27:55 EST |
> >Why would anyone spend $1000+ > >on a camera and then use Gold 200 at a wedding ? > At first i thought hey, maybe she was _trying_ to achieve a slightly soft focus effect, you know, since it was wedding photos... and maybe you don't want the super-sharpness of some Zuikos... but then I saw the above, and asked "Gold 200'? Then I realized she didn't have enough brains to _try_ and get soft effects. George S. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] PBM list (portly bearded males) (was:Zuikophile is known shirtlabel agitator), Scott Gomez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] AF vs. MF.. Proof!!, John A. Lind |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] AF vs. MF.. Proof!!, Olympus |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Looking for Mirror Lockup comparison, Olympus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |