Photoshop can do things, but it can't add in things
that aren't there, just rearrange the stuff that is
already in the picture. Still panorama photography got
a lot easier with it and a couple of extra shots
rather than using a suerwide, a shift has a lot more
abilities to it that will still beat a 'corrected'
picture 1000f the time in final printing. Again,
just an opinion.
Mark Lloyd
--- "Jim L'Hommedieu (Lama)" <jlamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I hesitate to chuck this "advice" in because it's
> not backed up with first
> hand knowledge. I've heard the PhotoShop allows the
> knowledgable user to
> "fix" perspective problems, digitally. If a new
> shift lens isn't an option,
> perhaps he could justify buying and mastering this
> (suposed) option. Once
> mastered, he could create a macro to use on future
> occasions.
>
> As I have stated before, mastering stitching
> software has radically
> diminished my lust for a super-wide.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> Lama
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|