ML Archiv: RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20

Subject:	RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20
From:	"Olaf Greve" <o.greve@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:49:14 +0100

Hi,

> be he's teasing me, or was he really hinting that there's a "digital OM"
in the works?

Hmmmm, do I see hints of a deja-vu? Meaning: E-10/E-20 having the same fate
as the FTL had??? :)))

Cheers!
Olafo


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, (continued) Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Tom Scales Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Larry Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Tom Scales Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Larry Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Tom Scales Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, ll . clark RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, James N. McBride Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Frank van Lindert Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, ll . clark RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Olaf Greve <= RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20 /computer wars, Gregg Iverson Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, John Hermanson Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, Jay Maynard Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, John Hermanson Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, DAVDOU9211

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] sticking diafragm..., andrew fildes
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] Made in Japan 50mm, Harry Wiechel
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20, ll . clark
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] E-10 vs. E-20 /computer wars, Gregg Iverson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]