ML Archiv: Re: [OM] One camera, one lens

Subject:	Re: [OM] One camera, one lens
From:	Henrik Dahl <hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:47:10 +0200

After much thought, I have decided I will have to go with my OM2n and a 35/2

I had a very hard time deciding between that and the 85/2

Chuck



Sophie's choice... :-(

Henrik Dahl

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, (continued) Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Tris Schuler Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Chris Barker Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Chris Barker Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Gary Edwards RE: [OM] One camera, one lens, gries RE: [OM] One camera, one lens, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Paul Wallich Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Charles Sdunek Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Henrik Dahl <= Re: [OM] [OT] Afghanistan thinking, Nick Taylor Re: [OM] [OT] Afghanistan thinking, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] [OT] Afghanistan thinking, Henrik Dahl Re: [OM] [OT] Afghanistan thinking, Dirk Wright Re: [OM] [OT] Afghanistan thinking, Tris Schuler Re: [OM] [OT] Afganistan thinking, Larry Re: [OM] [OT] Afganistan thinking, Chris Barker Re: [OM] [OT] Afganistan thinking, Doggre Re: [OM] [OT] Afganistan thinking, Chris Barker Re: [OM] [OT] Afganistan thinking, Doggre

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] "Stop down adapter" anyone?, Wayne Harridge
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Haves and Have-nots, Henrik Dahl
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] One camera, one lens, Charles Sdunek
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] [OT] Afghanistan thinking, Nick Taylor
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]