Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] CCD vs scanner

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] CCD vs scanner
From: "W.Xato" <xato0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
But it is difficult to manipulate the apparent degree
of sharpness with regular darkroom printing processes
(short of the real "unsharp mask" process). Whereas
for the digital image, sharpness can literally be
dialed in for whatever size print and viewing distance
is required.  So even if the darkroom print had higher
sharpness when viewed close up, the apparent sharpness
of the digitally aided print might be higher.

Warren

--- Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tom writes:
> 
> << Prints from sharpened 4000 dpi scans are
> considerably sharper than
> conventional darkroom prints. >>
> 
> That doesn't seem possible on a consistent basis. 
> Printers themselves
> only give us enough "resolution" to seem sharp. But
> look at a
> photographic print with a loupe versus a ink jet
> printer output and
> you'll see there is detail to spare in most
> photographic prints.
> 
> Gary Reese
> Las Vegas, NV
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 


=====
Warren Xato

For where to go when you know when
-PhotoDates-and-Places@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz