To keep myself lean in these graduate school years, I need to limit
myself to 2. my original thought was to have a 90/2 and 200/4, but the
85/2 focal length and size are more appealing than the 90/2, and the
distance you get w/ the 135 seems to be enough. I also have the 2x-A
that could make a nice 270/5.6 instead of a gargantuan 400/8. remember,
the subject is architectural details, and I don't need that much "reach"
What would y'all say about the 135/2.8 over the 200/4?
<snip>
No! a true Zuikoholic should have all... 85/2, 90/2, 100/2, 135/2.8,
135/3.5, I have them all :-)
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|