At 01:06 AM 7/24/2001 -0700, "mike m." (passing on a response to his query to
the seller about the 350/2.8 on eB*y) wrote:
>FWIW, I inquired on the storage and location of this lens. Since it has
>been stored in the case for 5-7 years fungus is a posibility.
>It's apparent he knows nothing about camera gear of this quality. Also
>his *Bay info says he is in LA but he says the lens was stored in
>Florida.Here is the reply.
[snip]
>its possible
>it
>could be sold for way under whats its worth giving the buyer with balls
>a
>super deal. and thats fine be me for who's willing to take the chance
>and
>not give me static.
[snip]
You know, it always amazes me just how God-awful moronic some people are. This
person is apparently willing to kiss off a grand or so U.S. (by not offering a
reasonable examination/return policy on such an expensive purchase) just so he
doesn't get a potential purchaser who will "give [him] static."
This person's too dumb to share my air -- there, I've said it, I'm an
intolerant doorknob. In the future, we're gonna use people like this for food,
mark my words. He's got "Soylent Green" written all over him. Fire up the
vats!
Garth
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|