Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Zuiko 35-80, worth it?

Subject: RE: [OM] Zuiko 35-80, worth it?
From: Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:26:02 -0700

What were the details on "Austin Skyline"?

Those two (presumably cave) Antelope Canyon shots are surreal. What did you do to
capture those?

Tris


At 04:50 PM 7/19/01 -0500, you wrote:
Richard,

The Zuiko 35-80/2.8 is a sweet lens.  Sharp as zooms go, very bright,
contrasty, purty heavy for a Zuiko.  Depends on what you're after.  If I was
going to be stuck with only a zoom lens, the 35-80/2.8 would be it.

http://www.finestlight.com/santa_fe.asp has some of my stuff on it -- all
shot with this lens. (Thanks again, Tom!)

HTH!

Dave

>After a few years of moving to Pentax ZX-5 and the Olympus C-3000 Digitial
>camera, I am moving back to the OM-4T. I am thinking about getting the
>Zuiko 35-80 zoom. Currently I have Tamron SP90 Macro and a Zuiko
>24, so the
>zoom is right in the middle. The lens is pretty expensive though, even the
>used one is about $900.
>
>Any thoughts on the "worthiness" of spending $900 for this used lens?
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz