The Vivitar 28-90mm f2.8 Series One would also do the photography aspect of the
job extremely well, and at only about $125-$150. (Makes sense unless you're one
of those that spending $900-$1100 wouldn't be missed at all.)
Larry
Chris Johns wrote:
> I wish I had one...of course, but I have bonded rather admirably to my
> Tamron 35-80 2.8 zoom...a nice lens that covers that range and you would
> not feel that wallet pain. Might wanna try one if you are in a thrift mode.
>
> Chris
>
> At 01:46 PM 7/19/01 -0700, you wrote:
> >After a few years of moving to Pentax ZX-5 and the Olympus C-3000 Digitial
> >camera, I am moving back to the OM-4T. I am thinking about getting the
> >Zuiko 35-80 zoom. Currently I have Tamron SP90 Macro and a Zuiko 24, so
> >the zoom is right in the middle. The lens is pretty expensive though, even
> >the used one is about $900.
> >
> >Any thoughts on the "worthiness" of spending $900 for this used lens?
> >
> >
> >// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
> >[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
> >
> >
> >< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> >< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> >< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|