At 11:41 AM 7/3/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>In a message dated 7/3/01 8:29:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
>>
>>*NOT* the LR44! It's an *alkaline* version, which has too high a
>>resistance and the wrong discharge curve.
>
>
>Well duh! I had LR44s in my newly acquired OM-4t and my OM-2. They have
>been removed! SR44s from now on. Thanks Garth. I assume that I should use
>none Alkaline battery in the OM-1 currently at Photosphere being converted to
>1.5v operation? If so, what is the correct nomenclature for that battery.
It *should* be the same -- SR44, SR44W, "Silver 76," 357, etc.
Garth
|