ML Archiv: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al.

Subject:	[OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al.
From:	Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 21 May 2001 16:57:13 -0700

Thanks Susan, that helps to clear (several) things up  :)

Mike

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Bruce Kolber Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Robert Winters Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., andrew fildes Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Dirk Wright Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., DaEyeGuy [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Mike Lazzari <= [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., WKato Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., DaEyeGuy

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] AOL Newsreader font size, Mike Lazzari
Next by Date:	OT Stressed Polaroids was: [OM] Gallery update, Clyde Soles
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., DaEyeGuy
Next by Thread:	[OM] Optics 102: Aging, Apparent Focusing Distance reference, et. al., Chuck Norcutt
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]