Through the generosity of a fellow list member, I am now the proud owner of
an awfully nice 50/2 macro. As most of you know, I also own the 90/2 which
is one of my favorite lenses.
I guess I am interested in the opinions of those that have used both. I
love the 90/2, but this 50/2 seems like a real winner. The first thing I
noticed is how much smaller and lighter it is than the 90/2. It is still
bigger than the 50/1.2, but not by that much.
So, what's the real benefit of one over the other?
Tom
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|