Well, the eSif says the both go to 1/2x. I realize the perspective is
different, but I was thinking more of the intangibles, such as bokeh. The
90/2 produces such beautiful images (although, agreeing with Chip, the
Tamron results are too close to see that much difference).
Guess the solution is to just go use them!
Tom
From: "Mickey Trageser" <mickeytr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> While I don't have either lens, I don't understand the question. Aren't
you
> comparing apples and oranges? 90 vs 50? The only thing I would expect to
> compare is the macro ability. But even that is different. What's the ratio
> on each lens? Even if that is equal, your focal length will change the
> perspective of the view. Wouldn't the 50 have a greater depth of focus?
>
> Well, which ever one you decide you prefer, just send the other over here
to
> Eldersburg to ensure it won't be neglected. ;-)
>
> Mickey
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|