| Subject: | Re: [OM] 50/1.4 vs. 50/1.8 |
|---|---|
| From: | "mike m." <mnmitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Sep 2000 07:57:03 -0500 |
james olson wrote: > > does anyone on the list have a paper weight 50/1.8 they'd be willing to part > ways with? (preferrably within the desirable multi-coated / after 1,000,000 > s.n. range people seem to talk about...) The s/n > 1,000,000 refers to the 50mm f1.4 , AFAIK this is irrelevent for the 50mm f1.8. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 50/1.4 vs. 50/1.8, Dirk Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] How many were there ?, Garry Lewis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50/1.4 vs. 50/1.8, Dirk Wright |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50/1.4 vs. 50/1.8, Paul Farrar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |