Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1822

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1822
From: Charlie Stricklen <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 08:50:12 -0400
> Hello zuikoholics. I've been lurking here for several months. I've learned a 
> great deal and I have enjoyed
> the conversations immensely. This list is unsurpassed for information, 
> civility, humor and camaraderie. I
> haven't contributed much simply because others have expressed quited capably 
> what I have been thinking, in
> most cases. (By the way, I happen to think the quick wit in Lex's posts *far* 
> outweighs any of the negatives
> some have pointed out.)

> But I couldn't let this one pass. For heaven's sake! I know this is the 
> Olympus list and all, and there is a
> special place in my heart for my Oly stuff. But, when it comes to auto focus, 
> are you seriously saying that
> the Nik*not-an-OM*on N90s, F100 or F5 are slow? Do they hunt? I must have low 
> standards and worse eyes than I
> thought. Seems to me one of these wonder bricks will find, lock on and focus 
> perfectly before your eye can
> even focus on the result!

>
> In case you are interested, I chose Minolta over the others because I found
> them to be more user friendly and I like the feel a lot better than Canon
> and Nikon.
> The wireless flash is cool also.  The AF is slow and hunts a lot on all of
> them
> in my opinion.  The Oly digital C2500 is a better focusing camera than
> any of them.  I have worked with them all.
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz