In a message dated 8/18/00 9:41:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Film's cheap, and you only pay processing for the exposed film. I'm
> always amazed at the lengths people will go to to "finish" a roll of
> film.
>
> BBB
I keep saying this to people who shun the Pentax 645 because it does not have
interchangeable backs. My answer is just to waste the rest of the roll,
losing an average of 7 shots. The cost of this is just a few bucks. You
could "waste" one half of a hundred to two hundred rolls of film for the cost
of a Hassy A12 back. As a practical matter you would never be changing film
types (slides, prints, or B&W) that often.
Warren
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|