| Subject: | Re: [OM] 28/3.5 bokeh :) |
|---|---|
| From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:56:35 -0600 |
Gwynne, I admit I honestly don't understand it either, so I, personally, am glad you asked. It certainly is a cool term, though. Rolls off the tongue. Bokehhhhhh. Tom > Greetings, > > I hate to expose my ignorance to the whole world, but what does "bokeh" > mean? > > Gwynne Little > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Teles vs Everything Else, Giles |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Photography in "public" places, Morgan Sparks |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 28/3.5 bokeh :), Little, Gwynne |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Meaning of bokeh (was "28/3.5 bokeh"), Joel Wilcox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |