Re: [OM] wide angles

[Barks]

> Barks wrote:
> >
> >
> > That is what I have done: I now have a 21/3.5 complementing (note the
> > 'e' BTW) my 28/2.8.    But only to rationalise my range, since the
> > 24/2.8 worked very well for me.
> >
>
> LOL.  So, you mean your 21/3.5 doesn't stand up and say "Hey 28/2.8,
> lookin' gooood"?
>
> george
LoL! Look stop please ... it's late at night and my wife thinks I'm 
*working* with my computer and she can hear the sniggers :-)
Chris

~~~~~ ><>
Chris Barker
mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >