Re: [OM] wide angles

[george]

Barks wrote:
> 
> 
> That is what I have done: I now have a 21/3.5 complementing (note the
> 'e' BTW) my 28/2.8.    But only to rationalise my range, since the
> 24/2.8 worked very well for me.
> 

LOL.  So, you mean your 21/3.5 doesn't stand up and say "Hey 28/2.8,
lookin' gooood"?

george

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >