Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000")

from Giles

Subject:	Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000")
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 13 Nov 1999 00:12:30 +0000

By Oly numerical logic a 5 would be another manual camera.  One thing the Om 
system 
does not need.

Giles

Acer V wrote:

> What happend to the 5? ;-)
> 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Peter A. Klein Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Barry B. Bean Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Giles Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Acer V Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Giles <= Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Keith (R.K.) Berry Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Chris Barker [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Frank Ernens RE: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Dave Bulger RE: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Giles

Previous by Date:	[OM] The OM-1 Arrives, Jim Mueller
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Domestic (US) airlines & film & x-ray machines, etc., Gregg Iverson
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Acer V
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Glasses wearers' laments (was "OM2000"), Keith (R.K.) Berry
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]