ML Archiv: Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t

from Acer Victoria

Subject:	Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t
From:	Acer Victoria <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 1999 08:04:33 -0700 (PDT)

Quick question (sorry if it's been asked; don't recall it): what's the
difference between T and Ti? 

/Acer "steppenwolf" Victoria
--
.sig


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] om4 vs om4t, Chris C Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, John Hermanson Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, Acer Victoria <= Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, John A. Prosper Re: [OM] om4T vs om4Ti (was "om4 vs om4T"), Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, Garry D. Lewis Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, John A. Lind Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, Dirk Wright [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Chip Stratton Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Terry and Tracey Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Hans van Veluwen RE: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Chip Stratton Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Terry and Tracey

Previous by Date:	[OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8, Leopoldo S�nchez Rodr�guez
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] 200/f4 vs. 180/f2.8, Steven_Read
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, John Hermanson
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] om4 vs om4t, John A. Prosper
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]