| Subject: | Re: [OM] Leica jewelry OT |
|---|---|
| From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:18:18 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Acer Victoria wrote:
> <this msg is OT; sorry, this is third reply, and hence didn't have
> Doris' email addy>
>
> Also, not to flame, but the law of dimishing returns hits VERY hard after
> a point;
Acer makes some coinosseur points here. The law of diminishing returns
hits hard right after the $12 disposable camera, IMO.
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested, *- DORIS FANG -* |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested, *- DORIS FANG -* |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Leica jewelry OT, Acer Victoria |
| Next by Thread: | dimishing returns, was Re: [OM] Leica jewelry OT, Acer Victoria |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |