The Kiron 28-105 has an excellent reputation. I have one & like its
results. Heavy, tho. and not a true zoom - it is Varifocal, so you have
to refocus when you change zoom settings with a stationary subject.
Tom
--- Original Message ---
From: "Hans van Veluwen" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date sent: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 12:15:20 +0200
> :I am interested in others' recommendations for third party zooms in the
> range of 28-135 and 80-200.
>
> Tokina had two excellent lenses in exactly these ranges:
>
> AT-X 28-135mm F4~4.6 weight 795g.
> AT-X 80-200mm F2.8 weight 1090g.
>
> Big advantage of carrying all this weight is that _you_ will loose weight.
> So the total weight remains the same compared to carrying light lenses.
>
>
> hnz (justifying carrying too much gear)
------------------
From: Tom Trottier, President, ACT Productions Inc.
infoanim@xxxxxx http://www.act.ca
+1 613 594-4829 fax +1 613 594-8944
199 Holmwood Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 2P3
"Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|