| Subject: | Re: [OM] Re:OT, Jpg, was: Lordly Com.......... |
|---|---|
| From: | Richard Ross <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:56:54 +0000 |
At 10:31 13/01/99 EST, Paul wrote: >I obviously misunderstood your original post. Sorry. I think Richards comment >should be read as each time a JPEG is opened and *re-saved* there is a loss. That's what I meant, yes. Sorry if I wasn't too clear! Opening and closing the file *without re-writing it* has no harmful effects on its archival properties :-) Richard < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Be careful what you wish for..., Denton Taylor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Be careful what you wish for..., Denton Taylor |
| Previous by Thread: | Re[2]: [OM] Re:OT, Jpg, was: Lordly Com.........., Dave Haynie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re:OT, Jpg, was: Lordly Com.........., Scj9000 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |