Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] f/2 vs. f/2.8 primes.......

Subject: Re: [OM] f/2 vs. f/2.8 primes.......
From: Richard Schaetzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 17:46:52 +0100
Peter A. Klein wrote:

> To which, I remark:
> There are two major issues here:
> 
> 1.  Is an f/2.8 wide angle lens better optical quality than a f/2?
> 2.  Is a 28 a reasonable substitute for a 35 and a 24?
> 
> This interests me, too, as the next lens I get may be a wide-angle.  My
> current outfit is 35/2.8, 50/1.4 and 100/2.8.  I'm inclined toward a 24
> rather than a 28. More on that in a moment.

An 24mm might be a better addition to an 35mm lens than an 28mm.

Regards

Richard



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz