At 11:40 PM 12/5/1998 EST, you wrote:
>Hi James:
>
>> 1) are the slower primes generally equal to the faster primes? (wide
>> angle again...)
>>
>> 2) how is the 28mm/2.8? i have read the list daily for ages, and not a
>> lot of conversation has taken place on this one.........
>
>Did you notice Lens Test 1 and Lens Test 2 that I posted here over the last
>few weeks? I tested a number of your lens, plus the 28mm f/2.8 Look in the
>future for even more tests, esp. the f/2 wide angles, the 18mm f/3.5 and the
>50mm f/3.5
>
>Most of the common lenses also have their Popular or Modern Photography lens
>tests posted at Lee Hawkin's WWW site.
>
>Gary Reese
>Las Vegas, NV
>
James,
If you are looking for subjective impressions of the 28/2.8, I can tell you
that I like mine very much. A lot of that has to do with how I see: I
also have a 21-35 zoom (Sigma) and find when I use it I am either at 21 or
28 most of the time.
The 28/2.8 is very fine. With it and the 85/2 I could suffice (although
don't tell my wife that).
Joel
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|