OM-2000 has a just adequate viewfinder @ 930f picture field w/50mm lens
(Oly's data)
Bill >;)
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 22:08:04 -0400 Morgan Sparks <msparks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
writes:
>Michael A. Covington wrote:
> Here's what I know so far:
>>
>> OM-F, OM-10: More than adequate for eyeglass wearer
>> OM-1MD: Just adequate
>> OM-2SP: Just a bit short, but quite usable
>> OM-4T: Severely inadequate
>>
>
>As I recall, my old OM-10 did not have a 97creen. I think only the
>OM 1-2-3-4 have it. IMO the small size body/97% viewfinder is OM's
>most
>important feature. My OM-1n's viewfinder image is bigger than that in
>my 2S, and it seems a little brighter too, with 1-series screens.
>
>My college photo teacher used Minolta SRT's because he said they were
>easy to use with his glasses. I don't know what % viewfinder they
>had,
>but I've always been curious.
>
>Morgan Sparks
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|