Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: Re[2]: [OM] OM-4T(and others... (eyepoint)

Subject: Re[2]: Re[2]: [OM] OM-4T(and others... (eyepoint)
From: Dave Haynie <dhaynie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 10:21:58 -0500 (EST)
On Sat, 24 Oct 1998 17:29:19 -0500, brookswf@xxxxxxxx (BILL F BROOKS) jammed 
all night, and by sunrise was overheard remarking:

> Ziv sez the OM-1(N) has only? a 93 0.000000ield of view,

Where? On the normal Ziv OM Camera guide at
http://www.teamti.com/Ziv/OM/OM-Cameras.htm
he has both OM-1 and OM-1N (as well as OM-2..OM-4) at 97 0.000000ield-of-view.
The magnification at 50mm drops with the OM-2s, OM-3, and OM-4; this I
didn't realize.

I would be shocked if it were any less. I bought my first OM-1 right
when the MD model came out, but I had followed it very closely before
then (I was in High School, photography my main hobby, years before home
computers came along). One of the big-story items about the OM-1 was the
field-of-view. Most SLRs showed less than 90% at the time, I think
perhaps the Nikon F-1, Canon A-1, and maybe one other super-pricey
camera were at or about 100%, but it was unheard of in the OM-1's price
range (as were lots of other things: interchangable focusing screens,
motor drive capability, nickel-chromium lens mount, etc). 

> OM-10 had same spex as OM-1(N)'s did (according to Ziv)

This same Ziv page lists the OM-10 at 93%. 

--
Dave Haynie  | V.P. Technology, Met@box Infonet, AG |  http://www.metabox.de
Be Dev #2024 | NB851 Powered! | Amiga 2000, 3000, 4000, PIOS One



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz