ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other...

Subject:	Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other...
From:	"Marco" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	16 Oct 98 21:48:08 +0200

On Ven, 16 ott 1998 8:38, John Austin <mailto:j_austin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
>Nikon 20-35 f/2.8D             weight: 640 grams           length: 94mm
>
>Olympus 35-80 f/2.8           weight: 650 grams           length: 99mm
>
AF Nikkor D 35-70/2.8           weight: 665 g                   lenght: 95mm

Marco



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., (continued) Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Stephen Worner RE: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., PCACala Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., John Austin Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., WKato Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., gma Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Ken Norton Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., gma Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Ingemar Uvhagen Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Jim Loudon Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Marco <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Zuiko 8mm fisheye, Marco
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Kodachrome 64, Paul haigney
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other..., Jim Loudon
Next by Thread:	[OM] digital backs; OM as the "ultimate" system; battery hogs, William Sommerwerck
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]