Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other...

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus Vs. Other...
From: Jim Loudon <jloudon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 13:58:23 -0400
> The Oly equivalent might be the 21/3.5, 28/2.8, and 35/2.8, which would
weigh
> 180, 170 and 170 g. respectively, totalling 520 g.

Let's pour it on :-) and include the 24mm f/2.8 -- which would
also take the total weight past that of the zoom.

Even so, having that much mass (640g for the zoom, plus ??? for
the camera) hanging around my neck is not my idea of fun.  Much
better just to have an OM-2 with the 21mm f/3.5.  Leave the other
stuff to the Ned Gilette wannabes...

jim

 



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz