I have the 75-150 f/4 also and I never use it.
I carry: 24/2.8, 50/1.4, 100/2.8, and 200/4 whenever I go anywhere, the
300/4.5 if I think I may need it, and the zooms usually stay home. I
really enjoy the lightness and compactness of the 100/2.8, and I'm
pleased with the images I get out of it. I think you'll find it easily
with the $75 :).
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Ingemar Uvhagen
Sent: Friday, August 14, 1998 2:33 PM
To: OM
Subject: [OM] Zuiko 100/2.8
Friends,
I have a Zuiko 100/2.8 reserved for me until Monday 17 for a price of
SEK 495 (US$ ~62) + SEK 85 (US$ ~11) for shipping. A good price I think.
Now, the reason I write is to hear any comment on the 100/2.8. How good
is it? I have been looking through the tests at R. Lee Hawkins' page,
but the info on the 100/2.8 is way under the info on the 100/2. So I
would like to hear if anyone of you list members have the Zuiko 100/2.8,
if so, what can you tell?
At the moment I have the Zuiko 75-150/4 but I will get other (fixed
focal length) lenses in that range to get more speed. The plan for the
future is to get the 85/2, 100/2 or 2.8, 135/2.8. I will also get the
180/2.8 as a compliment to my 200/4.
The condition of the 100/2.8?
Well, it is said to be 3 of a scale from 1-4 (1=bad, 4=top), but I have
to see for myself as I have seven days to regret and send it back
besides for the six month warranty.
Got to buy it, don't you think?
--
Regards/
Ingemar Uvhagen
Gislaved, Sweden
- Netscape Communicator user -
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|