The 2000 is probably built better than the other Cosina versions. Didn't
Cosina
opt for a plastic body casting on their own model? I'll bet the 2000
reliability
will have little in common with the other "versions" out there.
John
www.zuiko.com
gma wrote:
> Second place was different. He knew right away what the 2000 was. He said
> that he was resisting carrying it because: "cameras from that manufacturer
> have
> been very unreliable". "You mean Cosina?"
> "Right. Cosina. We've carried the Ricoh KR-5 which is essentially the same as
> the OM-2000 and the return rate with camera failure has been greater than 20%.
> I think you'd be better off with a used OM-1."
>
> So now I'm wondering if the 2000 is the way to go. I'll probably wait now to
> see what happens at Photokina. Really hoping for a good OM-5Ti to make it's
> appearance.
>
> george
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|