ML Archiv: Re: [OM] EOS

Subject:	Re: [OM] EOS
From:	"Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:48:30 +1000

>not to mention their 45 and 90 mm shift
>and tilt lenses. Why haven't Olympus included tilt features on some lenses?
>I certainly would have rushed to the store.
>
>Ulf Westerberg


I agree with you on this one.

Foxy


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] EOS, Terry and Tracey Re: [OM] EOS, Ulf Westerberg Re: [OM] EOS, John A. Prosper Message not available [OM] dont read test, paul haigney Re: [OM] EOS, Ken Norton Re: [OM] EOS, R. Lee Hawkins Re: [OM] EOS, Ken Norton Re: [OM] EOS, Terry and Tracey <= Re: [OM] EOS, Marco Re: [OM] EOS, John A. Prosper Re: [OM] EOS, Richard Sch�tzl Re: [OM] EOS, Ken Norton Re: [OM] EOS, Denton Taylor Re: [OM] EOS, Richard Sch�tzl Re: [OM] EOS, Giles Re: [OM] EOS, Peter Leyssens Re: [OM] EOS, Richard Sch�tzl

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Batteries for OM2S, Terry and Tracey
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] my replies, Terry and Tracey
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] EOS, Ken Norton
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] EOS, Marco
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]