John Austin wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've got an OM-2 (not n), and am considering trading it for an OM-2SP. I'm
>wondering if this would be a wise or economical move? From looking at the
>specs, it appears that the only difference between the two cameras is the
>program mode and the spot meter. The program mode would have very limited
>usefullness for me. The spot meter function would be great.
>
>I've heard that the OM-2SP is not as well built as the OM-2(n). It
certainly
>feels different in the hand, somehow not as solid feeling. And there is the
>the potential circuit board problem, though John H. says this is rare and
>most OM-2SP and OM-4 are very reliable.
>
>As to the cost, I would be looking at $100 USD to $150 USD difference
>between the two. Any opinions on whether this would be a good trade? Is the
>spot meter worth the additional money and what about the reliability and
the
>"feel" of the OM-2SP as compared to the OM-2? Would you trade if it were
>your camera?
>
John,
My worst experiences of OM-gear is with the OM2Sp. Originally my wifes
camera, electronics died on her and had to be replaced (at the time these
were readily available). Since these new electronics played havoc with her
as well (ISO dropping out frequently), she ultimately lost her patience and
went to Pentax auto-focus (shudder). I overtook the camera and used it only
for a couple of months until one cold evening (-15 C) the winding mechanism
got stuck and eventually the whole camera got jammed. Now it was my turn to
loose my patience. Since repair costs were equal to a good used OM2 I never
fixed it.
Of course others may have totally different stories, but since you asked for
an opinion, well, if I had a good working, OM2, no way I would trade it for
an OM2Sp.
Just MO
Ulf Westerberg
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|