| Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-Nature |
|---|---|
| From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 1998 19:12:06 +1000 |
I plan to take macro shots >for medical purposes so distance is not an issue with me. I may at some time in >the future use it for nature shots. I may have some future use for 1:1 >reproduction, and looking at the chart the so I guess the 80 mm macro is the best >for this application unless i use the 90mm with a extension tube. Which do you >think is the better combination? >thanks again > I seem to remember reading that the 135mm was designed for medical purposes. Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Macro Lens, Terry and Tracey |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-Nature, Terry and Tracey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-Nature, PCA Cala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-Nature, Terry and Tracey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |