Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-2S Program vs OM-2 spot/program

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-2S Program vs OM-2 spot/program
From: John Hermanson via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:42:52 -0400
Cc: John Hermanson <omtech1@xxxxxxxx>
I think if you set f stop so your auto shutter speed is 1/30, and fire on ttl 
flash, you get one stop of fill from the flash (raising shutter speed to 1/60). 
 Each smaller f stop will give that much more fill from flash.  2/2N will both 
do this (I think). Regarding the 2S:  another difference in some 2S, is that 
some bodies have a top cover with a "raised" pentaprism hump.  When a circuit 
was replaced by Olympus USA, a modified replacement top was installed, with a 
prism hump extended by 0.5mm.  This was to prevent cracking of the main circuit 
IC(s) as the top was pressed down.  Old top side wall = 1mm, new top =1.5mm.  



Sent using https://www.zoho.com/mail/








---- On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 21:56:21 -0400 MICHAEL GORDON via olympus 
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ---



<<If the user gets interested in TTL flash, <<the 2n is better. 
 
Please elaborate.  Did not the plain 2 fill in with ambient if the flash was 
insufficient?  I think the 2n could be forced to do that.  Both protocols have 
their advantages. 
 
Student of Dr. Flash,  Mike 
 
 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________ 
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus 
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ 
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz