Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] Viewfinders [starry 14mm]

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Viewfinders [starry 14mm]
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 15:57:41 -0700
On 4/25/2021 3:17 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
U. W. A. Moose:
<<<Not a big problem.
        <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/WayneS/BokehBokeh.htm>

Bokeh is improved--tad less brightness and contrast.

Primarily, blur to tame edginess/business.

Still a rather oddball use of UWA--not saying it isn't as valid as any other.

I'm interested in FL choice for C-Ups as a matter of choice of perspective. These flowers, and their relationship to the background,  would look quite different, shot at say 200mm.

I think the first exposure to UWA use in macro in
my world was an old post by John Lind using an OMZ 21F2 with short extension 
tube aimed inside a tulip--worked rather well, IIRC.

As I recall, that lens had quite a bit of field curvature focused close. Depending on direction of curvature and shape of subject, that can be used to advantage.

Matter of Perspective Moose

--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz