| Subject: | Re: [OM] E-520 |
|---|---|
| From: | Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Mar 2020 17:10:54 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
I found the shape of the E-500 easy to adjust to, even after 30 years of
using the OM-1/2. The grip shape on the right side makes it easy to operate
with one hand. The E-400 you have is pretty much the same shape.
>
>> For now I'm going to enjoy the warmth of pre-emptive smugness.
>
>The 520 is surprisingly a decent little camera. It fits me wrong as
>it's a large camera shape in a small body. The lumps are all wrong.
>But the camera itself is essentially an OM-D EM5 Mark 0.5
>
Chris
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
- Hunter S. Thompson
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Monochrome, Tina Manley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Monochrome, Ken Norton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-520, Chris Trask |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-520, Chris Trask |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |