ML Archive: Re: [OM] OT: not quite

Subject:	Re: [OM] OT: not quite
From:	Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 27 Jan 2019 22:02:55 -0900

> Sorry to hear. I would seriously consider used, I've bought a lot from KEH 
> and it was always superb.

Used works well for me. I don't feel nearly as guilty for putting that
first scratch on it when it already is scratched.

AG Schnozz
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] OT: not quite, (continued) Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Scott Gomez Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] OT: not quite, John Duggan via olympus Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Ken Norton Message not available Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Wayne Shumaker Message not available Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Ken Norton Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Moose Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Frank [OM] OT: not quite, Bob Benson Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Bill Pearce Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Ken Norton <= Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Moose Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Frank Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Mike Gordon via olympus

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Bill Pearce
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Frank
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Bill Pearce
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT: not quite, Moose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] OT: not quite