On 8/2/2018 1:25 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
Moose wrote:
For whatever reason, much as I tried to keep everything equal, the E-1
decided to underexpose by about a stop. I adjusted EV +1.0 in the
converters. I don't think that's messed anything up.
I'm not sure if you were referring to the in-camera histogram when
setting exposures,
There's a histogram??
Good thing I have a PDF manual. In Playback, with a slightly byzantine coordinated working of finger and thumb, I get a
histogram that's so coarse as to be hard to use.
No, I wasn't using it.
but that's not unusual behavior. The E-1 will
underexpose most of the time to protect the highlights. It's FAR
better to bring up the exposure in post than the pull exposure in post
with E-1 images. Generally speaking, it does underexpose by a stop in
most scenarios.
I just wandered through the relatively few pix I've taken with so far. Your generalization doesn't hold on this sample.
It might be slightly different/darker than later models, but nothing like the at least one stop I experienced with this
exposure. With the same settings, the E-400 exposure is slightly lighter than the E-M5 II.
Light and Dark Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|