Thanks, Don. No, not as taken. Cropped and processed in LRCC and PS.
That glare was a big problem!
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
On 8/2/2018 1:13 PM, Don Holbrook wrote:
Excellent rare (to me) catch. Like the background. As taken?
On August 2, 2018 at 1:12 AM Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/1/2018 11:48 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
Moose noted that my bee wings were not captured in yesterday's post. Despite
poor light, I went out today to see what
effect an increase from 1/500 to 1/1000 would have on the capture. Here are
two shots that convince me that 1/1000 is
about right; the wings are seen but slightly blurred, giving a sense of
motion. YMMV.
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20180801-DSCF9081.JPG.html
http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/20180801-DSCF9084-2.JPG.html
Ah yes, nice.
I suppose the necessary SS may depend on the subject speed of wing beats. This
shot of a hovering fly (that acts like a
bee) catches the wings pretty well @ 1/250.
<https://photos.app.goo.gl/mQHge6qWSX3Y31GQ9>
Flying Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
