| Subject: | Re: [OM] Lens |
|---|---|
| From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:01:10 -0500 |
| Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Martin writes: <<I've also read about the purple artifacts when using (some) Panny lenses on Oly cameras. So far though, I've not read of that issue with the 35-100/2.8. You will not read about it as that lens is noted not to have an issue. Panny lenses are thought to be designed for UV cut-off at 430 nm vs 390nm for Oly. List of most severely affected lenses in link below with note that the 35-100 has not been seen to have any significant issues. http://alanwatsonforster.org/writing/mft-purple.html No fringe, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Upcoming Weather, Philippe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: More Experimenting with Bird Images, Jim Nichols |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Lens, Martin Walters |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Star Wars Christmas, Christopher Crawford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |