Well done, Sir Moose. 👌
On Feb 7, 2017 1:18 AM, "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks to those who choose to play a no win game - except for the fun, of
> course. :-D
>
> On 2/4/2017 8:59 AM, ChrisB wrote:
>
>> Well Mystrious Moose
>>
>> The first is the bottom of a copper funnel, I should guess.
>>
>
> Well, yes, I can see that - now. :-)
>
> Impossible to guess, I think. This is what the ground looked like as I sat
> at a picnic table after some heavy rain. <http://galleries.moosemystic.
> net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Tech/Misc&image=_B005825oof50.jpg>
>
> On the ground was a tiny, maybe 1/8" sq., piece of glitter; lots of kids
> birthday parties in this park. With the sun reflecting fully off it, I took
> this intentionally very OoF shot, and liked the results. It wasn't very
> interesting in focus; didn't even push the button. ;-)
>
> The second is tricky, but it must be a macro shot of an old leaf, perhaps
>> on a lake bed or wet mud near a lake.
>>
>
> This is the weird one. A pretty straightforward focus stack of a leaf,
> maybe 7" long, lying on a slightly reflective surface. The surface ended,
> in very dark area, too close visually to the top of the leaf. So I selected
> that area in PS and tried Content Aware Fill. CAF is sometimes
> astonishingly good, sometimes so-so, sometimes just weird. This was the
> latter, with artifacts that looked remarkably like distant mountains. But I
> kinda liked it, so I went with it, trying out a couple of other results,
> moving things around, removing a few artifacts that didn't fit.
>
> So a shot that covers a couple of feet of actual subject looks like one of
> those things you and Rick guessed. I love serendipity.
>
> The third is a charcoal drawing.
>>
>
> This is a C-U of a scraped area on a yellow enamel surface. I think it
> looks like a drawing, too, which is why I shot, processed and posted it it.
>
> The fourth is the bottom of a plate with dents to give it a stand on the
>> underside.
>>
>
> I can see that. Actually the reverse, the top of an outdoor stool, with
> drain holes.
>
> I’m being bold, here . . .
>>
>
> Indeed! And I much appreciate it! I would certainly never have seen the
> downward tapered opening appearance of the first. I also like separating
> images from the things that were photographed in interesting ways.
>
> On 2/4/2017 9:25 AM, Rick Beckrich wrote:
>
>> Here goes nothin'....
>>
>> 1. Serena Williams winning ball
>>
>
> I LOVE it! I'm surprised no one suggested the final asteroid, entering our
> atmosphere. It does look fast and hot. I also thought the background looks
> rather like clouds at night.
>
> or a moose-made pinhole lens.
>>
>> 2. Dead leaf on s frozen pond.
>>
>> 3. A negative image of......
>>
>
> Actually, a positive.
>
> 4. Water draining.
>>
>
> Some of these stools have had water on them when I've photographed them,
> but not this time. And they are yellow; the blue just looked good to me
> when I was pulling an AG, wildly slinging a slider. :-)
>
> No one thought black holes??
>
>
> On 2/5/2017 12:15 AM, Philippe wrote:
>
>> Sole of a steam iron?
>>
>
> Yes! Why don't they make them in colors?
>
> Good book title, too. "Soul of a Iron, A Steamy Look at the Creation of
> Order Out of Chaos"
>
> Thankful Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|