Perhaps, but SilkyPix is ghastly to use!
Chris
C M I Barker | Gamlingay
> On 22 Sep 2016, at 16:43, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 3. SilkyPIX Developer Studio Pro 7 and Picture Window Pro or Photoshop
> Elements. Honestly, I think that SilkyPIX really is the best raw
> converter generally available. While Capture One does skin tones
> slightly better, and Adobe just gets you there mostly, SilkyPIX is in
> a league of its own for sharpness and tonal smoothness. The name
> "SilkyPIX" implies "Silky". Well, that is not a misnomer. It's like
> you increased the bit-depth by another half-dozen bits. The latest
> version is, in feature set, about equivalent to Lightroom from two
> years ago. Yet, there are adjustments in SilkyPIX that Adobe has no
> clue how to do. At the current exchange rate, the full version is
> about $220 USD. For flower and nature photography, there is no better
> converter than SilkyPIX, in my opinion.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|