Le 20 juin 2016 à 03:33, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Ah, I see that there are no more Leica DSLRs. I didn't know that.
>
Wrong, in part
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7448206943/a-lot-to-leica-hands-on-with-the-leica-sl-typ-601
Tina's been using one for some time now (Iran for instance)
Now, one might want to miniaturize the price tag …
Amities
Philippe
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/19/2016 8:39 PM, Moose wrote:
>> On 6/19/2016 2:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>> What does the R stand for. I can see that the adapter for the lens is
>>> labeled L(R). Does the R series have a unique mount?
>>
>> Yes indeedy, it's an SLR, hence the "R" for reflex, and needed a longer
>> register distance to clear the mirror box. (And otherwise, it couldn't
>> be adapted to a 4/3 camera.)
>>
>> Whole 'nother thing from the classic Leica rangefinders.
>> <http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/LeicaR.html>
>>
>> Reflexive Moose
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|