On 5/26/2016 2:53 PM, Mike Gordon via olympus wrote:
Yes, seems better to me too. The girl's head looks a tad stretched due to
volume anamorphosis--there are a few other signs of this effect as well. Would
consider a modest cylindrical correction
which is less accurate than a spherical correction but leads to less linear
distortion as there are straight lines in the shot as well. One can't have
perfectly straight lines and correct the anamorphosis, unfortunately.
My choice would be normocephalic subjects with slightly skewed lines.
How about normocephalic withOUT skewed lines?
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Shoe_Repair_Shop.htm>
On 5/26/2016 9:52 AM, Philippe wrote:
. . .
My point was not there - I'm not thinking in term of "laterality" but in term
of depth, which is another dimension. I was certain you had targeted the cobbler whatever
the means, AF or manual.
What I mean is that for this particular shot it would have been more beneficial
to have the character on left sharper and less the car in the background. Front
focusing a bit would have helped.
Now of course you can still defocus/blur-unsharpen the car in post.
Like the above? :-)
Scuffed Shoes Moose
PS: Layers Rule!
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
|