Well, I didn't get into the buttons and wheels and menus - where the SL
really beats the Canons, or the lens quality and the fact that I already
have a huge inventory of M and R lenses. Those are important
considerations, too.
Tina
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tina wrote:
> > I don't really care anything about all of the controlled, repeatable
> > tests. I care about whether I can focus the camera quickly, whether I
> can
> > take pictures in the dark, whether the camera is quiet and unobtrusive,
> > whether the batteries last a long time, and if the resulting photos tell
> > the story I want to tell. My old M6's still work great for all of those
> > except the focusing quickly part. That's why I got the SL. So far, I'm
> > happy.
>
> I agree, entirely. Yet, what you just described is any Canon DSLR.
> Once a camera achieves the basics of what you listed, you really get
> into intangibles that set one camera apart from another.
>
> There are reasons why Kodak Tri-X was the standard by which all B&W
> films were compared to.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Tina Manley
http://
<http://t.sidekickopen29.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=c6caac48-f51e-48dc-94fe-e9839c95a205>
www.tinamanley.com
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|